Lucky Brand Men's 367 Vintage Boot Leg Jeans Blue Size 31X30

These pants are stretchy and not like the 100% cotton they used to be.

Definitely a bit on the stretchier side, but also very comfortable. Searched high and low for a bootcut jean w/a wider boot opening and the cut of the 367 is EXACTLY what I'd been searching for. I grab a pair of each new wash that comes out as I feel this style has been losing ground to skinny jeans, which don't really suit me.

These are not jeans, they are legging that look like jeans. Way to much stretch. It's sad that seems to be all lucky sells now. I guess I am old fashioned and want my jeans to be 100% cotton.

I am a long-time customer to lucky brand and I had originally purchased the 367 vintage boot cut jeans a year ago when the material was 99% COTTON / 1% ELASTAN. Before Christmas '19, I had purchased 367 VINTAGE BOOT VERTICAL STRETCH JEAN and it had the same material as my old 367 vintage boot. I found in my latest order for the 367-vintage boot, the material had changed to 92% Cotton, 6% Polyester, 2% Lycra. For a long time, online customer there was no visibility that the item material consistency had changed. After talking to an agent on the phone I was made aware there was a fabric and care section, that I was truly unaware of as it requires a lot of scrolling. I just wish there was an update under the description that the material has changed. It was misleading to someone who had brought these jeans before and thought they/I were getting the same product. Maybe in the future the product description can be updated so there is no confusion or even a search for material percentages.

They stretch like yoga pants and there's nothing in the listing that would indicate that. Not the first time I've run into this either. Of course now Im stuck with them because its $15 to send them back.