Last Updated: 2025-07-31 23:45:55
Manufacturer | - |
---|---|
Brand | Under Armour |
Item model number | 1350196 |
Color | Black |
Weight | - |
Height | - |
Depth | - |
Product Id | 2544209 |
---|---|
User Reviews and Ratings |
4
(383 ratings)
4 out of 5 stars
|
UPC | 193444258813 |
# | Shop & Price | Reviews | User Ratings | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Check on Amazon
Price:
Search
Visit
![]() |
|||
2 |
Under Armour Women's Fly-By 2.0 Shorts
Reviews: 383
app.ratings:
(383)
Price:
$19.95
Visit
![]()
Reviews: 383
(4)
|
These were my favorite shorts , as I work outdoors and wear them daily (multiple pairs), but the "updated" 2.0 removed the pockets! The pockets were one of the reasons that I loved the old version, as I need a place to carry my phone while I work. I have some Play Ups with pockets but I don't love them due to lack of a liner. I was prepared to buy quite a few pair of Fly Bys to replace some aging pairs, but I guess I need to look for a new favorite short. Poor decision, UA.
What are you guys thinking taking away the pockets on these and whats up with the sizing? Why change a good thing??
Under Armour Women's Fly By Running Shorts-1st version was PERFECT. UA- you had a great product that was well liked and sought after. People loved the pockets. People loved the fit. BRING BACK 1.0!!! My rating is for 1.0. I can't stand 2.0- I purchased it and returned.
I used to buy only UA shorts (I own over 20 pair) but have not bought 1 pair since the pockets were removed. Why did you do that and what would it take to get the Fly by with pockets back??? They were perfect in every way-please bring them back.
Why in the world would you change your best selling shorts?? I see I'm not the only one who's disappointed. Please please please rethink this new design and bring back the pockets.
Loading reviews...
Products you might like
Loading related products...